Is Gay Sex Biological, Angst-Driven, or a Moral Failure?

tom12

I have a question –

Now that conservatism – like traditionalism, monogamy, spirituality, shaming language and other fairy tales – is dwindling down to zero, alt-lifestyles are increasingly becoming an outlet for the younger generation. But, are specific alt-lifestyles biological, angst-driven or ‘moral failures’?

Alternative lifestyles include, but are not certainly limited to… Black science, Feng Shui, nudism, lifestyle travelers, bisexuality, homosexuality, promiscuity, feminism, MGTOW, BDSM, polygamy, hypergamy, homeschooling, prostitution, etc. I’m not interested in making a series summarizing every alternative lifestyle. I’ll just discuss certain aspects and sympathetic claims of homosexuality that are arguably cringe-worthy.

One sympathetic claim states that people were “born this way”.

No one was born with a sexual preference. Most people don’t even respond to sexual attraction until they reach puberty, or until they’ve snuck into their daddy’s ‘happy box’ full of depictions of happy, naked people in compromising positions. Gay sex – like straight sex – is biological. While some antics are acts of rebellion, humans have a biological desire to try new things out of boredom with indifferent, routine sex with the same person or persons.

Another sympathetic claim is that a man cannot control what makes his dick hard…

I disagree with that…

…for the same reason why sexual orientation is a choice, though urges are biological. For the same reason why some guys don’t like their women fat, over 40, or a certain ethnicity and why some women turn lesbian or ‘nun’. Whether or not we can control our own urges is a different ball game. Rape victims who have no clue as to which side of the sexual fence they should be on amid reaching adulthood is also a different ball game. Yes, it leads to recklessness in some cases, but not generally.

How is homosexuality ‘angst-driven’?

Homosexuality, bisexuality or any other form of ‘tri-sexuality’ is one of the world’s oldest pastimes. Even in history, some of it was driven by angst. Even then, women engaged in anal sex during the history of not only Rome, but in Asian cultures as well. In most cultures, promiscuity, homosexuality, colonization, bisexuality and inebriation was a social norm, plus it was a way of celebration in all-male coteres. It was no different from something like, let’s say… the sexual revolution in the late 1960s. You can argue that it was just people doing what came naturally, it was history repeating itself or if you want to take the high moral ground, you can conclude that it was “just a bunch of white folks out of control”.

During slavery, gay slave owners who engaged in buck-breaking festivities. Male-on-male rape was used as a war weapon in Anglo-Saxon hierarchies as well as Asian ones. This was not about sexual attraction, but it was about muscle-flexing and the humiliation via sexual demise of one’s opponent. This historic concept of power and crushing one’s enemy has influenced how some men interact with other men in correctional facilities, ‘law’ enforcement and in the bedroom. In prison, like the outside world, domineering bigwigs use humiliating same-sex psychology to keep younger, weaker and timid dudes in check, or as sex slaves. Gay Republicans, ‘Tops’ and closet homosexuals practice this same regimen: the pitcher is gay, but the one swinging the bat and balls is not gay. This can be a peculiar form of power, or a dangerous form of denial.

Is homosexuality driven by choice in all-male hangout sports like, let’s say… locker rooms or the military? Does feminism play a part in it? What about prisons, where men are not given access to women, other than girlie magazines, female nurses who they may jerk off to while psychologically envisioning an image of her? Is it possible that some guys are allowing their curiosities to become an outlet? Or are they taking drastic measures – acting based on despair? It could be the same desperation that causes men to bang a bunch of 2s & 3s. Trust me, dry spells aren’t easy to endure. But does that mean you have to fuck anything with a crack in it?

A friend of mine – a former prison guard – told me how guys would give up the booty to other men, voluntarily and involuntarily. Guys sucked cocks and took it in the ass in exchange for contraband, such as candy, cigarettes or a piece of mind. Some embrace their sexual deviances while others act super-macho as a way to hide their homosexual tendencies.

Over the years, I’ve had many gay guys making passes at me via social networks – most being white butt-boys, transvestites, cuckold fetishists and sashimi smooth crossdressers. FetLife and Flickr is full of these types – effeminate white boys who like being bent over by ‘sexually superior’ black guys, or a female dominatrix. But this issue is better off discussed in a separate topic…

All forms of human carnalities are biologically driven based on impulse, desire and stimulation. For gays and lesbians in coed or same-sex settings, it’s no different. We are all humans. Some just hide it to save face. In youth homes, prisons and mental hospitals, guys get caught playing with eachother’s corndogs and cornholes out of boredom, curiosity or as a means of exercising dominion over someone who they innately fear, or who’s weaker than them.

And let’s be real — Some guys prefer feminine men (aka ‘sissies’) because they can be used harder and nastier in ways the average woman may not like.

Those who considers homosexuality a ‘moral failure’ has disgustingly failed in pushing morality.

Homosexuality is not some trend created by liberals, nor some conspiracy to destroy family-structures. Conservatives may abhor male-on-male sex publicly, but behind closed doors, they engage in it in the same sense undercover blacks do… especially under the impression that their come-stained underwear won’t get aired out. Which brings me to another aspect…

Conservatives and race-purists are so hell-bent on trying to raise the state of marriage. But if we were to legalize gay marriage in the west, wouldn’t it do just that? The divorce rate hoovers over 60% and nearly all of them are initiated by women. Plus given the solipsistic nature of women, wouldn’t gay marriage be more stable than heterosexual marriage? Don’t get me started on how some women would prefer their husbands having sex with men instead of other women, who they perceive as a threat to their egos and lavish lifestyles. Class irrelevant, most men in power do lead double lives. Not just those gay Republicans who want to have their cake and eat it too, like the feminists.

There’s the issue of blatant homophobia found in black culture, specifically rap music, the Caribbean islands and the black church. This collectively causes gay or bi black men to lead double lives, which somehow ruins the women they are also intimate with. But there’s a bizarre hypocrisy and self-hate buried underneath all this.

Numerous church leaders told blacks to vote Dubya in 2004 because they said John Kerry endorses gay marriage. These guys were smart enough to push fake morality to blacks under the assumption that they don’t respond well the homo vibe. But like the Catholic priests, black religious leaders who preach against lust and fornication wrong get caught with their dicks out. The Republican Party also is full of closet homosexuals and pro-family-values dudes who get caught fucking their interns, secretaries, babysitters, underage boys, transsexual and gay escorts. I could talk about the dark underworld of black entertainment where most hip-hop artists and moguls are bisexual and get tingly sensations for having grudge-sex with transsexuals and male ‘bottoms’. Then there’s the issue of sexual abuse bestowed upon male celebrities.

I’m sorry, but White and Asian men are the most effeminate men. Biologically, their masculinity pales in comparison to that of men of darker hue. Their women make their situations worse by embracing feminism, ‘girl power’, liberalism and hypergamy. It’s the same reason why these guys praise two types of patriotism: capitalism and conservatism – both ‘powers that be’ feminize and sodomize them both hypothetically and economically.

Is white-knighting linked to homosexuality, sexual abuse or effeminate traits?

Ask yourselves, why would any straight man support feminism or white-knighting tendencies, when the proof is in the pudding that they are both scams and supporting these ideologies will put you at the bottom of the sexual food chain? While the message is one in the same, feminism is a scam, while white-knighting is more of a trend. Feminism is more about ‘supremacy’ than equality. White-knights, like nice guys, wander aimlessly through life in a state of psychiatric emasculation, regardless of their exterior.

Effeminate men are typically raised in matriarchal settings, which is worse than a boy being adopted and raised by two gay guys. I mean, at least the boy would have a sense of virility and the wherewithal to have some ‘balls’. Single motherhood worsens the pathology of playing Captain Save-A-Hoe, which has turned into a marketing genius. Simps, manginas and white knights are usually raised by single mothers, domineered by power-bitches and goddess-worshipping regimens. Many of them were either victims of sexual abuse as children, saw their mothers used and abused by multiple men, or their mothers were hell-bent on teaching them morals, spirituality and how to cater to women their whole lives.

To put it simple and purposely nasty, matriarchal societies mind-fuck impressionable young men, while religious and conservative ‘leaders’ butt-fuck impressionable young men, turning them into full-blown manginas.

I can understand guys having more in common with women than men. You know, the ones who are overly interested in their woman’s ‘needs’. I’m not talking about guys who understand that women ‘come’ first. It’s the manginas, white-knight captain save-a-hoes who are the real enemy of social progress, not gays and sissies. Some manginas have hormonal problems. They do not have what it takes to please women, for social or physical reasons. Yet, they have pride in not paying for sex, because they believe ‘payers’ are ‘abusers of women’, blah, blah, blah… So they become chronic masturbators or gay. Not to make blanket statements, because sometimes, gays have an easier life than most heterosexuals.

As far as feminism’s contempt for homosexuality, it is all for the same reason why feminists loathe male sexuality in general. A woman’s sex drive is like a Ferrari, whereas the average guy’s sex drive is like a Ford in comparison. But of course, women won’t explicitly state that. It’s no biggie if two chicks kiss on a televised awards ceremony, but in the public eye, gay or bi dudes are more ‘perverse’ than heterosexuals. In post-feminist Anglosphere where women get away with shit even kids can’t, does anyone think more men who go ‘civilian’ may become gay or bisexual? The fact that most guys today are single, or they act single will add more fuel to the fire.

Also, something is happening in the west where men are losing their aura. Feminism aside, more guys are becoming fatter, timid, sexually devoid and they are giving up on themselves fast. Maybe this is why PDE5 inhibitors and testosterone boosters are booming in sales. Then, there’s what I call a ‘Virago Complex’, which I’ll discuss later in another topic…

– Is homosexuality or bisexuality a ‘sickness’? No. But I will say that most of that shit is angst-driven in ways to get statements of power or rebellion across. For others, it’s about nature taking it’s course. Similarly, some females become sluts, ‘whores’ and young single mothers just to get the hell away from their moralistic, homely upbringings. It’s only considered a ‘moral failure’ because it goes against the grain of everything conservatives, race-purists and other infallible-types strive to maintain.

One thought on “Is Gay Sex Biological, Angst-Driven, or a Moral Failure?

  1. Wait a minute……these men made a pass at your after you told them you were str8?!

    How many asked and how many times did they ask you to top them? How did you stop them?

    I had it happen several times and it’s usually via social networking hookup sites. I know it deals with the phenomena of some dudes who want to be broken in by some other man who is more dominant and ‘hotter’ than them, but then I also blame “straight” black men who have sex with other men, but claim they are still “straight” just because they are “tops”. I don’t advocate nor do I condone that shit. Social media/networking and the age of smartphones makes it easier to block certain people in general, which is not the easiest thing to do in public.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s